Doing bad for a good cause. Thats what we called him robin hood.well play all artist good script and plot of the story. Waiting for a second franchise of this movie. Must watch.
The classic Robin Hood story has been brought on the big screen many times. I have seen the version of Kevin Costner in 1991 and the version of Russell Crowe in 2010. This time it is the turn of "Kingsman" Taron Egerton become the Great Theft L, although The background origin of all this "Robin Hood" and their process of robbing the rich and helping the poor are similar, but the story is always different. The film tells the heroic Robin to participate in the Crusades. After he returned to his hometown, he thought he could stay calm. However, he saw his hometown under tyranny, the society was full of criminals and cool, and the people’s life was bitter. In order to find peace, Robin teamed up with the enemy of the enemy, John, to try to fight against the tyrannical, corrupt bureaucrats and nobles and rebuild their beautiful homes. . . Taron Egerton's good acting, everyone has seen it in the "Kingsman" series, and the interpretation of the Oscar-winning Jamie Foxx is never a concern. Together with Leonardo DiCaprio, one of the producers, the lineup of the film is simply star-studded. Although the story of the new bottled old wine was not as good as earlier "Robin Hood", the ending also seems too sloppy, but it is undeniable that one or two scenes in the middle of films on the "Arrow" battle are very exciting.
The movie is quite bored. First of all, the movie has nothing to do with Robbin Hood or the director revamped it totally. If the director intend to tell a new story, he shouldn't use the name. I feel cheated. Moreover, the storyline is just so so. The are many scenes that are unnecessary and redundant, not even the star studded casts can share the movie. Save your time and money by watching other movies. Just my 2 cents.